FabDigitFabDigit

M55J vs T300

Composite · grade comparison

M55J and T300 are both composite grades. M55J is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 4,020 MPa (583 ksi) against 3,530 MPa (512 ksi) for T300, about 14% more. In exchange, T300 is the more ductile: elongation 1.5% versus 0.8% for M55J. T300 is lighter (1.76 g/cm³ vs 1.91 g/cm³ for M55J) and M55J is stiffer (540 GPa vs 230 GPa).

M55JChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

T300Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

M55J vs T300: properties

M55JT300

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

540 GPa78.3 Msi
230 GPa33.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

4,020 MPa583 ksi
3,530 MPa512 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.8%
1.5%

Compressive Strength

900 MPa131 ksi
1,570 MPa228 ksi

Flexural Strength

—
1,700 MPa247 ksi

Shear Strength

—
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.91 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³
1.76 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.1%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

155 W/m·K89.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
10.5 W/m·K6.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

753 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F
750 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

-1.1 µm/m·K-0.61 µin/in·°F
-0.41 µm/m·K-0.23 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
350°C662 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -269°C-452 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 500°C932 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

8×10⁻⁶ Ω·m315 µΩ·in
1.7×10⁻⁵ Ω·m669 µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

8×10⁻⁴ Ω·cm
0 Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

90 / 100
95 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 92 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

18 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

—
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

750 MJ/kg322,442 BTU/lb
400 MJ/kg171,969 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

50 kg CO₂/kg
26 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 700 L/kg83.9 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

2,105 kN·m/kg
2,006 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

282.7 MN·m/kg
130.7 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

107.8 mm²/s
8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

-1,049
-393

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityM55JT300
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

M55J vs T300 — frequently asked

Is M55J stronger than T300?

Yes. M55J has a typical tensile strength of 4,020 MPa (583 ksi) against 3,530 MPa (512 ksi) for T300 — about 14% more.

Which is cheaper, M55J or T300?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, M55J or T300?

T300, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 25/100 against 18/100 for M55J.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in M55J and T300 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.