FabDigitFabDigit

IM8 vs T300

Composite · grade comparison

IM8 and T300 are both composite grades. IM8 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 5,930 MPa (860 ksi) against 3,530 MPa (512 ksi) for T300, about 68% more. IM8 is the more ductile: elongation 2% versus 1.5% for T300. IM8 is stiffer (304 GPa vs 230 GPa) and IM8 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous).

IM8Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

IM8 vs T300: properties

IM8T300

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

304 GPa44.1 Msi
230 GPa33.4 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.27
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

5,930 MPa860 ksi
3,530 MPa512 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
1.5%

Compressive Strength

2,900 MPa421 ksi
1,570 MPa228 ksi

Flexural Strength

—
1,700 MPa247 ksi

Shear Strength

—
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.79 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.76 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.05%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

5.4 W/m·K3.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
10.5 W/m·K6.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
750 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

-0.55 µm/m·K-0.31 µin/in·°F
-0.41 µm/m·K-0.23 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
350°C662 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

600°C1,112 °F
500°C932 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -269°C-452 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1.55×10⁻⁵ Ω·m610 µΩ·in
1.7×10⁻⁵ Ω·m669 µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

—
0 Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
92 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

60 / 100
95 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

—
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

480 MJ/kg206,363 BTU/lb
400 MJ/kg171,969 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

30 kg CO₂/kg
26 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 700 L/kg83.9 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

3,313 kN·m/kg
2,006 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

169.8 MN·m/kg
130.7 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

3.4 mm²/s
8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

-192
-393

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityIM8T300
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

IM8 vs T300 — frequently asked

Is IM8 stronger than T300?

Yes. IM8 has a typical tensile strength of 5,930 MPa (860 ksi) against 3,530 MPa (512 ksi) for T300 — about 68% more.

Which is cheaper, IM8 or T300?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, IM8 or T300?

T300, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 25/100 against 20/100 for IM8.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in IM8 and T300 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.