FabDigitFabDigit

G5 vs Phenolic XX

Composite · grade comparison

G5 and Phenolic XX are both composite grades. G5 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for Phenolic XX, about 144% more. Phenolic XX is lighter (1.34 g/cm³ vs 1.95 g/cm³ for G5) and G5 is stiffer (17 GPa vs 7 GPa). On the shop floor, Phenolic XX machines more easily (very good vs poor) and Phenolic XX forms better (poor vs not recommended).

G5Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Phenolic XXChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

G5 vs Phenolic XX: properties

G5Phenolic XX

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

17 GPa2.5 Msi
7 GPa1 Msi

Shear Modulus

6 GPa0.87 Msi
2.7 GPa0.39 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.17
0.28

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

220 MPa31.9 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Compressive Strength

415 MPa60.2 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Compressive Modulus

16 GPa2.3 Msi
7 GPa1 Msi

Flexural Strength

310 MPa45 ksi
124 MPa18 ksi

Flexural Modulus

18 GPa2.6 Msi
8 GPa1.2 Msi

Shear Strength

125 MPa18.1 ksi
83 MPa12 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

12 MPa·√m10.9 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

550 J/m10.3 ft·lbf/in
27 J/m0.51 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

115 HRM
105 HRM

Hardness, Shore D

—
90 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
125 HRR

Same in both: Elongation at Break 1.5%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.95 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³
1.34 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.9%
1.3%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2%
4%

Glass Transition (Tg)

—
170°C338 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.35 W/m·K0.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

14 µm/m·K7.8 µin/in·°F
25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
120°C248 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

45%
32%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

—
175°C347 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in
1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

7.5
5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.03
0.04

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·cm
1×10¹¹ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω
1×10¹¹ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
125 V

Same in both: Dielectric Strength 15 kV/mm381 V/mil

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
65 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

45 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 0 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
5%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

113 kN·m/kg
67 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

8.7 MN·m/kg
5.2 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleG5Phenolic XX

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityG5Phenolic XX
Default conditionMelamine MatrixPhenolic Matrix
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 1 finish: Painting.

G5 vs Phenolic XX — frequently asked

Is G5 stronger than Phenolic XX?

Yes. G5 has a typical tensile strength of 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for Phenolic XX — about 144% more.

Which is cheaper, G5 or Phenolic XX?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, G5 or Phenolic XX?

Phenolic XX. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against poor (25/100) for G5.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in G5 and Phenolic XX side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.