FabDigitFabDigit

G-9 vs XXXPC

Composite · grade comparison

G-9 and XXXPC are both composite grades. G-9 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for XXXPC, about 118% more. XXXPC is lighter (1.35 g/cm³ vs 1.95 g/cm³ for G-9) and G-9 is stiffer (19 GPa vs 8 GPa). On the shop floor, XXXPC machines more easily (very good vs poor) and XXXPC sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than G-9 (high, $$$$).

G-9Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

XXXPCChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

G-9 vs XXXPC: properties

G-9XXXPC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

19 GPa2.8 Msi
8 GPa1.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.16
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Compressive Strength

345 MPa50 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Compressive Modulus

15 GPa2.2 Msi
6 GPa0.87 Msi

Flexural Strength

310 MPa45 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Flexural Modulus

18 GPa2.6 Msi
9 GPa1.3 Msi

Shear Strength

120 MPa17.4 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

400 J/m7.5 ft·lbf/in
27 J/m0.51 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

115 HRM
105 HRM

Elongation at Break

—
1.5%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.95 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³
1.35 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.8%
0.9%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.8%
3%

Glass Transition (Tg)

—
150°C302 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.32 W/m·K0.18 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

14 µm/m·K7.8 µin/in·°F
25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

155°C311 °F
120°C248 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

42%
26%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

12 kV/mm305 V/mil
20 kV/mm508 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

6.5
4.3

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.03
0.035

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·cm
1×10¹² Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω
1×10¹¹ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
150 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
55 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

45 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb
75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6 kg CO₂/kg
4 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 200 L/kg24 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

123 kN·m/kg
81 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

9.7 MN·m/kg
5.9 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityG-9XXXPC
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

G-9 vs XXXPC — frequently asked

Is G-9 stronger than XXXPC?

Yes. G-9 has a typical tensile strength of 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for XXXPC — about 118% more.

Which is cheaper, G-9 or XXXPC?

XXXPC is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while G-9 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, G-9 or XXXPC?

XXXPC. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against poor (30/100) for G-9.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in G-9 and XXXPC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.