FabDigitFabDigit

FR-2 vs XXX

Composite · grade comparison

FR-2 and XXX are both composite grades. XXX is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 92 MPa (13.3 ksi) for FR-2, about 20% more. XXX is the more ductile: elongation 1.3% versus 1.1% for FR-2. XXX is lighter (1.36 g/cm³ vs 1.55 g/cm³ for FR-2) and XXX is stiffer (8 GPa vs 7.5 GPa). On the shop floor, FR-2 machines more easily (very good vs good).

FR-2Choose it when the part is machined in volume.

XXXChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

FR-2 vs XXX: properties

FR-2XXX

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

7.5 GPa1.1 Msi
8 GPa1.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.25
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

92 MPa13.3 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Elongation at Break

1.1%
1.3%

Compressive Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Flexural Strength

115 MPa16.7 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Flexural Modulus

7.8 GPa1.1 Msi
8.5 GPa1.2 Msi

Shear Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

1.7 MPa·√m1.5 ksi·√in
1.6 MPa·√m1.5 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

31 J/m0.58 ft·lbf/in
45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in

Shear Modulus

—
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
7 GPa1 Msi

Same in both: Hardness, Rockwell M 105 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.55 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.36 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

110°C230 °F
—

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.55%
0.7%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2%
2.5%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.35 W/m·K0.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F
1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20 µm/m·K11.1 µin/in·°F
22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

105°C221 °F
120°C248 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

130°C266 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

30%
27%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

260°C500 °F
150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in
1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

20 kV/mm508 V/mil
15 kV/mm381 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

4.6
4.2

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.04
0.038

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹¹ Ω·cm
1×10¹³ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹¹ Ω
1×10¹² Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 125 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

48 / 100
60 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb
95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
—

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
81 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

4.8 MN·m/kg
5.9 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityFR-2XXX
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

FR-2 vs XXX — frequently asked

Is XXX stronger than FR-2?

Yes. XXX has a typical tensile strength of 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 92 MPa (13.3 ksi) for FR-2 — about 20% more.

Which is cheaper, FR-2 or XXX?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, FR-2 or XXX?

FR-2. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against good (60/100) for XXX.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in FR-2 and XXX side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.