FR-2 vs L
Composite · grade comparison
FR-2 and L are both composite grades. L is the more ductile: elongation 1.8% versus 1.1% for FR-2. L is lighter (1.36 g/cm³ vs 1.55 g/cm³ for FR-2) and L runs hotter in service (120°C vs 105°C continuous). On the shop floor, FR-2 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than L (premium, $$$).
FR-2Choose it when cost is the deciding factor.
LChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.
FR-2 vs L: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all composite grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all composite grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Elongation at Break
Compressive Strength
Flexural Strength
Flexural Modulus
Shear Strength
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)
Izod Impact, Notched
Hardness, Rockwell M
Shear Modulus
Compressive Modulus
Hardness, Rockwell R
Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 7.5 GPa1.1 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.25
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Glass Transition (Tg)
Water Absorption (24 h)
Water Absorption (Saturation)
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa
Limiting Oxygen Index
Max Service Temperature (short-term)
Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Dielectric Strength
Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)
Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)
Surface Resistivity
Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹¹ Ω·cm · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 125 V
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Corrosion Resistance
UV / Weathering Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Polishability
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | FR-2 | L |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$ Standard | $$$ Premium |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
FR-2 vs L — frequently asked
What is the difference between FR-2 and L?
FR-2 and L are both composite grades. L is the more ductile: elongation 1.8% versus 1.1% for FR-2. L is lighter (1.36 g/cm³ vs 1.55 g/cm³ for FR-2) and L runs hotter in service (120°C vs 105°C continuous).
Which is cheaper, FR-2 or L?
FR-2 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while L is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.
Which is easier to machine, FR-2 or L?
L, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 80/100 against 75/100 for FR-2.
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in FR-2 and L side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.