FabDigitFabDigit

M60J vs T1000G

Composite · grade comparison

M60J and T1000G are both composite grades. T1000G is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 6,370 MPa (924 ksi) against 3,820 MPa (554 ksi) for M60J, about 67% more. T1000G is the more ductile: elongation 2.2% versus 0.7% for M60J. T1000G is lighter (1.8 g/cm³ vs 1.94 g/cm³ for M60J) and M60J is stiffer (588 GPa vs 294 GPa).

T1000GChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

M60J vs T1000G: properties

M60JT1000G

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

588 GPa85.3 Msi
294 GPa42.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

3,820 MPa554 ksi
6,370 MPa924 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.7%
2.2%

Compressive Strength

1,000 MPa145 ksi
1,570 MPa228 ksi

Flexural Strength

—
1,800 MPa261 ksi

Flexural Modulus

—
165 GPa23.9 Msi

Shear Strength

—
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.27

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.94 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³
1.8 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

150 W/m·K86.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
10 W/m·K5.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

-1.1 µm/m·K-0.61 µin/in·°F
-0.5 µm/m·K-0.28 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 750 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F · Min Service Temperature -269°C-452 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 500°C932 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

7.6×10⁻⁶ Ω·m299 µΩ·in
1.4×10⁻⁵ Ω·m551 µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

7.6×10⁻⁴ Ω·cm
0 Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
92 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

90 / 100
95 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Polishability

—
40 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 15 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb
600 MJ/kg257,954 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

50 kg CO₂/kg
35 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

1,969 kN·m/kg
3,539 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

303.1 MN·m/kg
163.3 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

103.1 mm²/s
7.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

-886
-433

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityM60JT1000G
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

M60J vs T1000G — frequently asked

Is T1000G stronger than M60J?

Yes. T1000G has a typical tensile strength of 6,370 MPa (924 ksi) against 3,820 MPa (554 ksi) for M60J — about 67% more.

Which is cheaper, M60J or T1000G?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose M60J over T1000G?

Pick T1000G when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in M60J and T1000G side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.