FabDigitFabDigit

C/C vs C/SiC

Composite · grade comparison

C/C and C/SiC are both composite grades. C/SiC is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C/C, about 25% more. In exchange, C/C is the more ductile: elongation 0.5% versus 0.3% for C/SiC. C/C is lighter (1.75 g/cm³ vs 2.1 g/cm³ for C/SiC) and C/SiC is stiffer (65 GPa vs 60 GPa). On the shop floor, C/C machines more easily (fair vs not recommended).

C/CChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

C/SiCChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C/C vs C/SiC: properties

C/CC/SiC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

60 GPa8.7 Msi
65 GPa9.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

6 GPa0.87 Msi
25 GPa3.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.15
0.17

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.5%
0.3%

Compressive Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Compressive Modulus

45 GPa6.5 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

160 MPa23.2 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

55 GPa8 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Strength

14 MPa2 ksi
28 MPa4.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

6 MPa·√m5.5 ksi·√in
15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.75 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
2.1 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

—
0.2%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
20 W/m·K11.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

720 J/kg·K0.17 BTU/lb·°F
750 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

1 µm/m·K0.56 µin/in·°F
2.5 µm/m·K1.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

450°C842 °F
1,350°C2,462 °F

Min Service Temperature

-269°C-452 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

2,500°C4,532 °F
1,650°C3,002 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

2×10⁻⁵ Ω·m787 µΩ·in
0.001 Ω·m39,370 µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

0 Ω·cm
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 80 / 100 · UV / Weathering Resistance 100 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

25 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

1,000 MJ/kg429,923 BTU/lb
700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

60 kg CO₂/kg
45 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

69 kN·m/kg
71 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

34.3 MN·m/kg
31 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

31.7 mm²/s
12.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

80
18

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC/CC/SiC
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

C/C vs C/SiC — frequently asked

Is C/SiC stronger than C/C?

Yes. C/SiC has a typical tensile strength of 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C/C — about 25% more.

Which is cheaper, C/C or C/SiC?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C/C or C/SiC?

C/C. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against not recommended (10/100) for C/SiC.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C/C and C/SiC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.