FabDigitFabDigit

C/C vs Ox/Ox

Composite · grade comparison

C/C and Ox/Ox are both composite grades. Ox/Ox is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C/C, about 58% more. In exchange, C/C is the more ductile: elongation 0.5% versus 0.3% for Ox/Ox. C/C is lighter (1.75 g/cm³ vs 2.75 g/cm³ for Ox/Ox) and Ox/Ox is stiffer (75 GPa vs 60 GPa). On the shop floor, C/C machines more easily (fair vs poor).

C/CChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Ox/OxChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C/C vs Ox/Ox: properties

C/COx/Ox

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

60 GPa8.7 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

6 GPa0.87 Msi
25 GPa3.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.15
0.12

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.5%
0.3%

Compressive Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Compressive Modulus

45 GPa6.5 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Flexural Strength

160 MPa23.2 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Flexural Modulus

55 GPa8 Msi
65 GPa9.4 Msi

Shear Strength

14 MPa2 ksi
10 MPa1.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

6 MPa·√m5.5 ksi·√in
8 MPa·√m7.3 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.75 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
2.75 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
8%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
2 W/m·K1.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

720 J/kg·K0.17 BTU/lb·°F
1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

1 µm/m·K0.56 µin/in·°F
6 µm/m·K3.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

450°C842 °F
1,200°C2,192 °F

Min Service Temperature

-269°C-452 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

2,500°C4,532 °F
1,300°C2,372 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

2×10⁻⁵ Ω·m787 µΩ·in
1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

0 Ω·cm
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

—
5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.008

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
92 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 100 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
15 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

1,000 MJ/kg429,923 BTU/lb
600 MJ/kg257,954 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

60 kg CO₂/kg
45 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

34.3 MN·m/kg
27.3 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

31.7 mm²/s
0.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

80
1

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 69 kN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC/COx/Ox
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

C/C vs Ox/Ox — frequently asked

Is Ox/Ox stronger than C/C?

Yes. Ox/Ox has a typical tensile strength of 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for C/C — about 58% more.

Which is cheaper, C/C or Ox/Ox?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C/C or Ox/Ox?

C/C. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (15/100) for Ox/Ox.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C/C and Ox/Ox side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.