FabDigitFabDigit

C/C-SiC vs C/SiC

Composite · grade comparison

C/C-SiC and C/SiC are both composite grades. C/SiC is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C/C-SiC, about 36% more. C/C-SiC is lighter (1.95 g/cm³ vs 2.1 g/cm³ for C/SiC) and C/SiC is stiffer (65 GPa vs 60 GPa).

C/C-SiCChoose it when weight is the constraint.

C/SiCChoose it when strength drives the design.

C/C-SiC vs C/SiC: properties

C/C-SiCC/SiC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

60 GPa8.7 Msi
65 GPa9.4 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.18
0.17

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

110 MPa16 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Compressive Modulus

60 GPa8.7 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

230 MPa33.4 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

60 GPa8.7 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

5 MPa·√m4.6 ksi·√in
15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in

Same in both: Shear Modulus 25 GPa3.6 Msi · Elongation at Break 0.3% · Shear Strength 28 MPa4.1 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.95 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³
2.1 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

—
0.2%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
750 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

1.5 µm/m·K0.83 µin/in·°F
2.5 µm/m·K1.4 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-180°C-292 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

1,700°C3,092 °F
1,650°C3,002 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 20 W/m·K11.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 1,350°C2,462 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

5×10⁻⁴ Ω·m19,685 µΩ·in
0.001 Ω·m39,370 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

75 / 100
80 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

98 / 100
100 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

8 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

900 MJ/kg386,931 BTU/lb
700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

60 kg CO₂/kg
45 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

56 kN·m/kg
71 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

30.8 MN·m/kg
31 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

11.4 mm²/s
12.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
18

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC/C-SiCC/SiC
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

C/C-SiC vs C/SiC — frequently asked

Is C/SiC stronger than C/C-SiC?

Yes. C/SiC has a typical tensile strength of 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C/C-SiC — about 36% more.

Which is cheaper, C/C-SiC or C/SiC?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose C/C-SiC over C/SiC?

Pick C/C-SiC when weight is the constraint. Pick C/SiC when strength drives the design.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C/C-SiC and C/SiC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.