FabDigitFabDigit

A359/SiC/20p vs W75Cu25

Composite · grade comparison

A359/SiC/20p and W75Cu25 are both composite grades. W75Cu25 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for A359/SiC/20p, about 23% more; tensile strength follows at 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 340 MPa (49.3 ksi). W75Cu25 is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 0.5% for A359/SiC/20p. A359/SiC/20p is lighter (2.77 g/cm³ vs 14.8 g/cm³ for W75Cu25) and W75Cu25 is stiffer (250 GPa vs 98.6 GPa). On the shop floor, W75Cu25 machines more easily (poor vs not recommended).

A359/SiC/20pChoose it when weight is the constraint.

W75Cu25Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

A359/SiC/20p vs W75Cu25: properties

A359/SiC/20pW75Cu25

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

98.6 GPa14.3 Msi
250 GPa36.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

38 GPa5.5 Msi
96 GPa13.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

82 GPa11.9 Msi
208 GPa30.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

340 MPa49.3 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

310 MPa45 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.5%
5%

Compressive Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Compressive Modulus

99 GPa14.4 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
800 MPa116 ksi

Flexural Modulus

98 GPa14.2 Msi
—

Shear Strength

210 MPa30.5 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Same in both: Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.77 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
14.8 g/cm³0.53 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

180 W/m·K104 BTU/hr·ft·°F
200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

840 J/kg·K0.2 BTU/lb·°F
195 J/kg·K0.05 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.5 µm/m·K9.7 µin/in·°F
9.5 µm/m·K5.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
400°C752 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

300°C572 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.36 µΩ·in
4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.57 µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

—
4×10⁻⁶ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
50 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

95 / 100
100 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

12 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

190 MJ/kg81,685 BTU/lb
280 MJ/kg120,378 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
18 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
20%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

123 kN·m/kg
42 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

35.6 MN·m/kg
16.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

487 kJ/m³
289 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

77.4 mm²/s
69.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

35
52

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA359/SiC/20pW75Cu25

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA359/SiC/20pW75Cu25
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

A359/SiC/20p vs W75Cu25 — frequently asked

Is W75Cu25 stronger than A359/SiC/20p?

Yes. W75Cu25 has a typical yield strength of 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for A359/SiC/20p — about 23% more. Tensile strength is 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 340 MPa (49.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A359/SiC/20p or W75Cu25?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, A359/SiC/20p or W75Cu25?

W75Cu25. Its machinability rates poor (30/100) against not recommended (12/100) for A359/SiC/20p.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A359/SiC/20p and W75Cu25 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.