FabDigitFabDigit

A359/SiC/20p vs MA754

Composite · grade comparison

A359/SiC/20p and MA754 are both composite grades. MA754 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for A359/SiC/20p, about 89% more; tensile strength follows at 965 MPa (140 ksi) vs 340 MPa (49.3 ksi). MA754 is the more ductile: elongation 21% versus 0.5% for A359/SiC/20p. A359/SiC/20p is lighter (2.77 g/cm³ vs 8.3 g/cm³ for MA754) and MA754 is stiffer (149 GPa vs 98.6 GPa).

A359/SiC/20pChoose it when weight is the constraint.

MA754Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

A359/SiC/20p vs MA754: properties

A359/SiC/20pMA754

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

98.6 GPa14.3 Msi
149 GPa21.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

38 GPa5.5 Msi
57 GPa8.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

82 GPa11.9 Msi
165 GPa23.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

340 MPa49.3 ksi
965 MPa140 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

310 MPa45 ksi
585 MPa84.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.5%
21%

Compressive Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
—

Compressive Modulus

99 GPa14.4 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

98 GPa14.2 Msi
—

Shear Strength

210 MPa30.5 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in
—

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.77 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
8.3 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

180 W/m·K104 BTU/hr·ft·°F
12.9 W/m·K7.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

840 J/kg·K0.2 BTU/lb·°F
440 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.5 µm/m·K9.7 µin/in·°F
12.6 µm/m·K7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
1,100°C2,012 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

300°C572 °F
1,300°C2,372 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.36 µΩ·in
1.06×10⁻⁶ Ω·m41.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
78 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

95 / 100
100 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Polishability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 12 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

190 MJ/kg81,685 BTU/lb
260 MJ/kg111,780 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
17 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

123 kN·m/kg
116 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

35.6 MN·m/kg
18 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

487 kJ/m³
1,148 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

77.4 mm²/s
3.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

35
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA359/SiC/20pMA754

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA359/SiC/20pMA754
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

A359/SiC/20p vs MA754 — frequently asked

Is MA754 stronger than A359/SiC/20p?

Yes. MA754 has a typical yield strength of 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for A359/SiC/20p — about 89% more. Tensile strength is 965 MPa (140 ksi) vs 340 MPa (49.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A359/SiC/20p or MA754?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose A359/SiC/20p over MA754?

Pick A359/SiC/20p when weight is the constraint. Pick MA754 when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A359/SiC/20p and MA754 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.