FabDigitFabDigit

2124/SiC/25p vs MA754

Composite · grade comparison

2124/SiC/25p and MA754 are both composite grades. MA754 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) against 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) for 2124/SiC/25p, about 22% more; tensile strength follows at 965 MPa (140 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi). MA754 is the more ductile: elongation 21% versus 3% for 2124/SiC/25p. 2124/SiC/25p is lighter (2.88 g/cm³ vs 8.3 g/cm³ for MA754) and MA754 is stiffer (149 GPa vs 114 GPa).

2124/SiC/25pChoose it when weight is the constraint.

MA754Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

2124/SiC/25p vs MA754: properties

2124/SiC/25pMA754

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

114 GPa16.5 Msi
149 GPa21.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

45 GPa6.5 Msi
57 GPa8.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

90 GPa13.1 Msi
165 GPa23.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

620 MPa89.9 ksi
965 MPa140 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
585 MPa84.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
21%

Compressive Strength

700 MPa102 ksi
—

Compressive Modulus

116 GPa16.8 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

800 MPa116 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

114 GPa16.5 Msi
—

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in
—

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.88 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
8.3 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

140 W/m·K80.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
12.9 W/m·K7.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

830 J/kg·K0.2 BTU/lb·°F
440 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

15 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F
12.6 µm/m·K7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
1,100°C2,012 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

300°C572 °F
1,300°C2,372 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

6.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.56 µΩ·in
1.06×10⁻⁶ Ω·m41.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

32 / 100
78 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

95 / 100
100 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Polishability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 12 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

18 kg CO₂/kg
17 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 260 MJ/kg111,780 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

215 kN·m/kg
116 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

39.6 MN·m/kg
18 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,011 kJ/m³
1,148 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

58.6 mm²/s
3.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

51
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale2124/SiC/25pMA754

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability2124/SiC/25pMA754
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

2124/SiC/25p vs MA754 — frequently asked

Is MA754 stronger than 2124/SiC/25p?

Yes. MA754 has a typical yield strength of 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) against 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) for 2124/SiC/25p — about 22% more. Tensile strength is 965 MPa (140 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 2124/SiC/25p or MA754?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose 2124/SiC/25p over MA754?

Pick 2124/SiC/25p when weight is the constraint. Pick MA754 when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2124/SiC/25p and MA754 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.