FabDigitFabDigit

Cobalt-Chrome Alloy Haynes 188 vs L605

Cobalt-Chrome Alloy · grade comparison

Cobalt-Chrome Alloy Haynes 188 and L605 are both cobalt-chrome alloy grades. Both yield at about 464 MPa — strength does not separate them. L605 is harder — 240 HB against 215 HB for Haynes 188 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. Haynes 188 runs hotter in service (1,095°C vs 980°C continuous) and Haynes 188 conducts heat better (10.8 W/m·K vs 9.4 W/m·K). On the shop floor, Haynes 188 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than L605 (specialty, $$$$$).

Haynes 188Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

L605Choose it when surface hardness matters.

Haynes 188 vs L605: properties

Haynes 188L605

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

232 GPa33.6 Msi
225 GPa32.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

89 GPa12.9 Msi
87 GPa12.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

193 GPa28 Msi
178 GPa25.8 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

960 MPa139 ksi
1,010 MPa146 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

464 MPa67.3 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

53%
58%

Reduction in Area

50%
55%

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

380 MPa55.1 ksi
440 MPa63.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

110 J81.1 ft·lbf
90 J66.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

215 HB
240 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

95 HRB
98 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

225 HV
250 HV

Same in both: Shear Strength 620 MPa89.9 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.98 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
9.13 g/cm³0.33 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,302°C2,376 °F
1,329°C2,424 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,330°C2,426 °F
1,410°C2,570 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

10.8 W/m·K6.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
9.4 W/m·K5.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

403 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.9 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F
12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,095°C2,003 °F
980°C1,796 °F

Latent Heat of Fusion

—
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.7 % IACS
1.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.01×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.8 µΩ·in
8.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

15 / 100
18 / 100

Weldability

75 / 100
72 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
80 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 12%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

280 MJ/kg120,378 BTU/lb
250 MJ/kg107,481 BTU/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 19 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

107 kN·m/kg
111 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.8 MN·m/kg
24.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

464 kJ/m³
470 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3 mm²/s
2.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every cobalt-chrome alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

5007001,0001,5002,0008.28.48.68.89Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleL605Haynes 188

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityHaynes 188L605
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—Solution Annealed
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Electropolishing—Yes
Passivation (Stainless Steel)—Yes

Haynes 188 vs L605 — frequently asked

What is the difference between Haynes 188 and L605?

Cobalt-Chrome Alloy Haynes 188 and L605 are both cobalt-chrome alloy grades. Both yield at about 464 MPa — strength does not separate them. L605 is harder — 240 HB against 215 HB for Haynes 188 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads.

Which is cheaper, Haynes 188 or L605?

Haynes 188 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while L605 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose Haynes 188 over L605?

Pick Haynes 188 when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor. Pick L605 when surface hardness matters.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Haynes 188 and L605 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.