Cobalt-Chrome Alloy Haynes 188 vs S-816
Cobalt-Chrome Alloy · grade comparison
Cobalt-Chrome Alloy Haynes 188 and S-816 are both cobalt-chrome alloy grades. Both yield at about 464 MPa — strength does not separate them. Haynes 188 is the more ductile: elongation 53% versus 18% for S-816, and S-816 is harder (300 HB vs 215 HB). S-816 is lighter (8.68 g/cm³ vs 8.98 g/cm³ for Haynes 188) and Haynes 188 is stiffer (232 GPa vs 200 GPa). On the shop floor, Haynes 188 welds better (very good vs poor).
Haynes 188Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.
S-816Choose it when weight is the constraint.
Haynes 188 vs S-816: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all cobalt-chrome alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all cobalt-chrome alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Reduction in Area
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell B
Hardness, Vickers
Hardness, Rockwell C
Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.3
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Latent Heat of Fusion
Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Corrosion Resistance
Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.15 V
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Castability
Brazeability / Solderability
Polishability
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 30%
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 4
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every cobalt-chrome alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | Haynes 188 | S-816 |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
Haynes 188 vs S-816 — frequently asked
What is the difference between Haynes 188 and S-816?
Cobalt-Chrome Alloy Haynes 188 and S-816 are both cobalt-chrome alloy grades. Both yield at about 464 MPa — strength does not separate them. Haynes 188 is the more ductile: elongation 53% versus 18% for S-816, and S-816 is harder (300 HB vs 215 HB).
Which is cheaper, Haynes 188 or S-816?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which welds better, Haynes 188 or S-816?
Haynes 188. Its weldability rates very good (75/100) against poor (25/100) for S-816.
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Haynes 188 and S-816 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.