FabDigitFabDigit

Cobalt-Chrome Alloy F75 vs Phynox

Cobalt-Chrome Alloy · grade comparison

Cobalt-Chrome Alloy F75 and Phynox are both cobalt-chrome alloy grades. Phynox is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,850 MPa (268 ksi) against 510 MPa (74 ksi) for F75, about 3.6 times as much; tensile strength follows at 2,050 MPa (297 ksi) vs 720 MPa (104 ksi). In exchange, F75 is the more ductile: elongation 10% versus 3% for Phynox, and Phynox is harder (57 HRC vs 30 HRC). F75 runs hotter in service (600°C vs 400°C continuous) and F75 conducts heat better (14 W/m·K vs 12.6 W/m·K). On the shop floor, F75 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than Phynox (high, $$$$).

F75Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PhynoxChoose it when strength drives the design.

F75 vs Phynox: properties

F75Phynox

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

183 GPa26.5 Msi
175 GPa25.4 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

720 MPa104 ksi
2,050 MPa297 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

510 MPa74 ksi
1,850 MPa268 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
3%

Reduction in Area

12%
—

Compressive Strength

1,500 MPa218 ksi
1,900 MPa276 ksi

Shear Strength

500 MPa72.5 ksi
1,200 MPa174 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
800 MPa116 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

300 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell C

30 HRC
57 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

320 HV
630 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 220 GPa31.9 Msi · Shear Modulus 85 GPa12.3 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,330°C2,426 °F
1,440°C2,624 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,410°C2,570 °F
1,495°C2,723 °F

Same in both: Density 8.3 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

14 W/m·K8.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
12.6 W/m·K7.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

450 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
430 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

13 µm/m·K7.2 µin/in·°F
13.5 µm/m·K7.5 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

600°C1,112 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.9 % IACS
1.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

9.1×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35.8 µΩ·in
1.02×10⁻⁶ Ω·m40.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.3 V
-0.2 V

Corrosion Resistance

87 / 100
85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

12 / 100
10 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

10%
8%

Weldability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

78 / 100
—

Polishability

88 / 100
85 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb
130 MJ/kg55,890 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

11 kg CO₂/kg
9.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
—

Typical Recycled Content

25%
20%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

87 kN·m/kg
247 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

591 kJ/m³
7,778 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.7 mm²/s
3.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
9

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.5 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every cobalt-chrome alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

5007001,0001,5002,0008.28.48.68.89Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleF75Phynox

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityF75Phynox
CNC machiningYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
ElectropolishingYes—
Passivation (Stainless Steel)Yes—

F75 vs Phynox — frequently asked

Is Phynox stronger than F75?

Yes. Phynox has a typical yield strength of 1,850 MPa (268 ksi) against 510 MPa (74 ksi) for F75 — about 3.6 times as much. Tensile strength is 2,050 MPa (297 ksi) vs 720 MPa (104 ksi).

Which is cheaper, F75 or Phynox?

F75 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while Phynox is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, F75 or Phynox?

Phynox. Its weldability rates poor (30/100) against poor (25/100) for F75.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in F75 and Phynox side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.