FabDigitFabDigit

MgO Ceramic vs Silica Aerogel

Ceramic · grade comparison

MgO Ceramic and Silica Aerogel are both ceramic grades. MgO Ceramic is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) against 0.02 MPa (0.0029 ksi) for Silica Aerogel, about 5000 times as much. Silica Aerogel is lighter (0.1 g/cm³ vs 3.55 g/cm³ for MgO Ceramic) and MgO Ceramic is stiffer (300 GPa vs 0.01 GPa). On the shop floor, MgO Ceramic machines more easily (poor vs not recommended) and MgO Ceramic sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Silica Aerogel (high, $$$$).

MgO CeramicChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Silica AerogelChoose it when weight is the constraint.

MgO Ceramic vs Silica Aerogel: properties

MgO CeramicSilica Aerogel

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

300 GPa43.5 Msi
0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi

Shear Modulus

128 GPa18.6 Msi
0 GPa2.9×10⁻⁴ Msi

Bulk Modulus

155 GPa22.5 Msi
0 GPa4.35×10⁻⁴ Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.18
0.2

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
0.02 MPa0 ksi

Compressive Strength

1,000 MPa145 ksi
0.3 MPa0.04 ksi

Flexural Strength

170 MPa24.7 ksi
0.05 MPa0.01 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

1.6 MPa·√m1.5 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Vickers

620 HV
—

Hardness, Knoop

590 HK
—

Hardness, Mohs

6
—

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

3.55 g/cm³0.13 lb/in³
0.1 g/cm³0 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

2,800°C5,072 °F
—

Refractive Index

1.736
1.02

Porosity

2%
95%

Light Transmission

—
88%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.02 W/m·K0.01 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

935 J/kg·K0.22 BTU/lb·°F
850 J/kg·K0.2 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

13.5 µm/m·K7.5 µin/in·°F
3 µm/m·K1.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,700°C3,092 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

12 kV/mm305 V/mil
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

9.7
1.15

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

4×10⁻⁴
0.002

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
8 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
—

Sintering / Firing Temperature

1,700°C3,092 °F
1,050°C1,922 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

40 MJ/kg17,197 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3 kg CO₂/kg
6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

25 L/kg3 gal/lb
120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

28 kN·m/kg
0 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

84.5 MN·m/kg
0 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

12.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

1
0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every ceramic grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,000234567Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityMgO CeramicSilica Aerogel
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

MgO Ceramic vs Silica Aerogel — frequently asked

Is MgO Ceramic stronger than Silica Aerogel?

Yes. MgO Ceramic has a typical tensile strength of 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) against 0.02 MPa (0.0029 ksi) for Silica Aerogel — about 5000 times as much.

Which is cheaper, MgO Ceramic or Silica Aerogel?

MgO Ceramic is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Silica Aerogel is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, MgO Ceramic or Silica Aerogel?

MgO Ceramic. Its machinability rates poor (22/100) against not recommended (8/100) for Silica Aerogel.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in MgO Ceramic and Silica Aerogel side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.