FabDigitFabDigit

HfO2 vs MgO Ceramic

Ceramic · grade comparison

HfO2 and MgO Ceramic are both ceramic grades. HfO2 is harder — 800 HV against 620 HV for MgO Ceramic — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. MgO Ceramic is lighter (3.55 g/cm³ vs 9.5 g/cm³ for HfO2) and MgO Ceramic is stiffer (300 GPa vs 240 GPa). On the shop floor, MgO Ceramic machines more easily (poor vs not recommended) and MgO Ceramic sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than HfO2 (high, $$$$).

HfO2Choose it when surface hardness matters, or when the part sees heat.

MgO CeramicChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

HfO2 vs MgO Ceramic: properties

HfO2MgO Ceramic

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

240 GPa34.8 Msi
300 GPa43.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
128 GPa18.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

195 GPa28.3 Msi
155 GPa22.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.28
0.18

Compressive Strength

1,200 MPa174 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Flexural Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

1.8 MPa·√m1.6 ksi·√in
1.6 MPa·√m1.5 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

800 HV
620 HV

Hardness, Knoop

780 HK
590 HK

Hardness, Mohs

6.5
6

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

—
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

9.5 g/cm³0.34 lb/in³
3.55 g/cm³0.13 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

2,758°C4,996 °F
2,800°C5,072 °F

Refractive Index

2.1
1.736

Same in both: Porosity 2%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

1.7 W/m·K0.98 BTU/hr·ft·°F
40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

285 J/kg·K0.07 BTU/lb·°F
935 J/kg·K0.22 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

5.8 µm/m·K3.2 µin/in·°F
13.5 µm/m·K7.5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

2,200°C3,992 °F
1,700°C3,092 °F

Min Service Temperature

-269°C-452 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

20 kV/mm508 V/mil
12 kV/mm305 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

22
9.7

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.002
4×10⁻⁴

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

8 / 100
22 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
65 / 100

Sintering / Firing Temperature

1,750°C3,182 °F
1,700°C3,092 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb
40 MJ/kg17,197 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

45 kg CO₂/kg
3 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
25 L/kg3 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

—
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.3 MN·m/kg
84.5 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.6 mm²/s
12.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every ceramic grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,000234567Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityHfO2MgO Ceramic
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

HfO2 vs MgO Ceramic — frequently asked

What is the difference between HfO2 and MgO Ceramic?

HfO2 and MgO Ceramic are both ceramic grades. HfO2 is harder — 800 HV against 620 HV for MgO Ceramic — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. MgO Ceramic is lighter (3.55 g/cm³ vs 9.5 g/cm³ for HfO2) and MgO Ceramic is stiffer (300 GPa vs 240 GPa).

Which is cheaper, HfO2 or MgO Ceramic?

MgO Ceramic is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while HfO2 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, HfO2 or MgO Ceramic?

MgO Ceramic. Its machinability rates poor (22/100) against not recommended (8/100) for HfO2.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in HfO2 and MgO Ceramic side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.