FabDigitFabDigit

Amorphous Graphite vs MG Carbon Brush

Ceramic · grade comparison

Amorphous Graphite and MG Carbon Brush are both ceramic grades. MG Carbon Brush is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 20 MPa (2.9 ksi) against 5 MPa (0.725 ksi) for Amorphous Graphite, about 4.0 times as much. Amorphous Graphite is harder — 15 HV against 12 HV for MG Carbon Brush — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. Amorphous Graphite is lighter (2.25 g/cm³ vs 3.6 g/cm³ for MG Carbon Brush) and MG Carbon Brush is stiffer (13 GPa vs 7 GPa). On the shop floor, Amorphous Graphite sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than MG Carbon Brush (high, $$$$).

Amorphous GraphiteChoose it when surface hardness matters, or when weight is the constraint.

MG Carbon BrushChoose it when strength drives the design.

Amorphous Graphite vs MG Carbon Brush: properties

Amorphous GraphiteMG Carbon Brush

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

7 GPa1 Msi
13 GPa1.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

5 MPa0.73 ksi
20 MPa2.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.2%
—

Compressive Strength

30 MPa4.4 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Flexural Strength

9 MPa1.3 ksi
35 MPa5.1 ksi

Shear Strength

5 MPa0.73 ksi
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

0.8 MPa·√m0.73 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Vickers

15 HV
12 HV

Poisson's Ratio

—
0.22

Same in both: Hardness, Mohs 1.5

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.25 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
3.6 g/cm³0.13 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

3,650°C6,602 °F
1,083°C1,981 °F

Porosity

—
10%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

20 W/m·K11.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
110 W/m·K63.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

710 J/kg·K0.17 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

5.5 µm/m·K3.1 µin/in·°F
10 µm/m·K5.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

450°C842 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

0.001 Ω·m39,370 µΩ·in
5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m19.7 µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

0.1 Ω·cm
5×10⁻⁵ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
50 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

—
35 / 100

Sintering / Firing Temperature

—
850°C1,562 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

15 MJ/kg6,449 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.2 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

20 L/kg2.4 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

2 kN·m/kg
6 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

3.1 MN·m/kg
3.6 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

12.5 mm²/s
65 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

3
17

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every ceramic grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,000234567Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAmorphous GraphiteMG Carbon Brush
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Amorphous Graphite vs MG Carbon Brush — frequently asked

Is MG Carbon Brush stronger than Amorphous Graphite?

Yes. MG Carbon Brush has a typical tensile strength of 20 MPa (2.9 ksi) against 5 MPa (0.725 ksi) for Amorphous Graphite — about 4.0 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Amorphous Graphite or MG Carbon Brush?

Amorphous Graphite is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while MG Carbon Brush is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Amorphous Graphite or MG Carbon Brush?

Amorphous Graphite, by a small margin. Both rate excellent for machinability — 90/100 against 85/100 for MG Carbon Brush.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Amorphous Graphite and MG Carbon Brush side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.