FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum ATP-5 vs K100-S

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum ATP-5 and K100-S are both aluminum grades, both cast tooling plate al. K100-S is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) for ATP-5, about 9% more. K100-S is harder — 70 HB against 65 HB for ATP-5 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. K100-S is lighter (2.66 g/cm³ vs 2.78 g/cm³ for ATP-5) and ATP-5 conducts electricity better (40 % IACS vs 32 % IACS). On the shop floor, K100-S welds better (good vs fair).

K100-SChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

ATP-5 vs K100-S: properties

ATP-5K100-S

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
26 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

165 MPa23.9 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Compressive Strength

115 MPa16.7 ksi
—

Shear Strength

105 MPa15.2 ksi
115 MPa16.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

55 MPa8 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
70 HB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 110 MPa16 ksi · Elongation at Break 3%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.78 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.66 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

580°C1,076 °F
570°C1,058 °F

Liquidus Temperature

650°C1,202 °F
640°C1,184 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

142 W/m·K82 BTU/hr·ft·°F
140 W/m·K80.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

24 µm/m·K13.3 µin/in·°F
23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

40 % IACS
32 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.69 µΩ·in
5.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.13 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.8 V
-0.86 V

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

92 / 100
88 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

200%
190%

Weldability

50 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
12 / 100

Polishability

35 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Castability 80 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
9 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

60%
50%

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
68 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

85 kJ/m³
86 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

56.8 mm²/s
58.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

14
15

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleATP-5K100-S

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityATP-5K100-S
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

ATP-5 vs K100-S — frequently asked

Is K100-S stronger than ATP-5?

Yes. K100-S has a typical tensile strength of 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) for ATP-5 — about 9% more.

Which is cheaper, ATP-5 or K100-S?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, ATP-5 or K100-S?

K100-S. Its weldability rates good (60/100) against fair (50/100) for ATP-5.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ATP-5 and K100-S side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.