FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum AlSi9Cu3 vs CP-Al

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum AlSi9Cu3 and CP-Al are both aluminum grades. AlSi9Cu3 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) against 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) for CP-Al, about 3.0 times as much; tensile strength follows at 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) vs 105 MPa (15.2 ksi). In exchange, CP-Al is the more ductile: elongation 38% versus 2% for AlSi9Cu3, and AlSi9Cu3 is harder (85 HB vs 28 HB). AlSi9Cu3 is stiffer (75 GPa vs 69 GPa) and CP-Al conducts heat better (200 W/m·K vs 110 W/m·K). On the shop floor, AlSi9Cu3 machines more easily (good vs poor), CP-Al welds better (excellent vs poor), and AlSi9Cu3 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than CP-Al (high, $$$$).

AlSi9Cu3Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

CP-AlChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

AlSi9Cu3 vs CP-Al: properties

AlSi9Cu3CP-Al

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

75 GPa10.9 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Shear Modulus

28 GPa4.1 Msi
26 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

73 GPa10.6 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

165 MPa23.9 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
38%

Shear Strength

190 MPa27.6 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
28 MPa4.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

16 MPa·√m14.6 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

2 J1.5 ft·lbf
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
28 HB

Hardness, Vickers

90 HV
30 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.75 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

515°C959 °F
646°C1,195 °F

Liquidus Temperature

595°C1,103 °F
657°C1,215 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

110 W/m·K63.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F
23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
397 J/g171 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-253°C-423 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

24 % IACS
55 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.83 µΩ·in
3.13×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.23 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

38 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
32 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

70%
30%

Weldability

20 / 100
92 / 100

Formability (cold)

8 / 100
95 / 100

Castability

95 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
78 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

190 MJ/kg81,685 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
5%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

109 kN·m/kg
39 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.3 MN·m/kg
25.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

182 kJ/m³
22 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

45.5 mm²/s
82.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

21
13

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAlSi9Cu3CP-Al

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlSi9Cu3CP-Al
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

AlSi9Cu3 vs CP-Al — frequently asked

Is AlSi9Cu3 stronger than CP-Al?

Yes. AlSi9Cu3 has a typical yield strength of 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) against 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) for CP-Al — about 3.0 times as much. Tensile strength is 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) vs 105 MPa (15.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AlSi9Cu3 or CP-Al?

AlSi9Cu3 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while CP-Al is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, AlSi9Cu3 or CP-Al?

AlSi9Cu3. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against poor (32/100) for CP-Al; for welding the order is CP-Al first (excellent, 92/100) then AlSi9Cu3 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AlSi9Cu3 and CP-Al side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.