FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum AlSi7Mg0.6 vs AlSi9Cu3

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum AlSi7Mg0.6 and AlSi9Cu3 are both aluminum grades. AlSi7Mg0.6 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) against 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) for AlSi9Cu3, about 73% more; tensile strength follows at 355 MPa (51.5 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi). AlSi7Mg0.6 is the more ductile: elongation 10% versus 2% for AlSi9Cu3, and AlSi7Mg0.6 is harder (105 HB vs 85 HB). AlSi7Mg0.6 conducts heat better (155 W/m·K vs 110 W/m·K). On the shop floor, AlSi7Mg0.6 welds better (good vs poor) and AlSi9Cu3 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than AlSi7Mg0.6 (high, $$$$).

AlSi7Mg0.6Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

AlSi9Cu3Choose it when cost is the deciding factor.

AlSi7Mg0.6 vs AlSi9Cu3: properties

AlSi7Mg0.6AlSi9Cu3

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
28 GPa4.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
73 GPa10.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

355 MPa51.5 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

285 MPa41.3 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
2%

Compressive Strength

290 MPa42.1 ksi
—

Shear Strength

230 MPa33.4 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

24 MPa·√m21.8 ksi·√in
16 MPa·√m14.6 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

5 J3.7 ft·lbf
2 J1.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

105 HB
85 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

63 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

115 HV
90 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.75 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

555°C1,031 °F
515°C959 °F

Liquidus Temperature

613°C1,135 °F
595°C1,103 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

155 W/m·K89.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
110 W/m·K63.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
21 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

39 % IACS
24 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.83 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.78 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
38 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
62 / 100

Weldability

65 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
8 / 100

Castability

92 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 70%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

215 MJ/kg92,433 BTU/lb
190 MJ/kg81,685 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13.5 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
85%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

133 kN·m/kg
109 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27 MN·m/kg
27.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

564 kJ/m³
182 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

64.5 mm²/s
45.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

36
21

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAlSi7Mg0.6AlSi9Cu3

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlSi7Mg0.6AlSi9Cu3
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

AlSi7Mg0.6 vs AlSi9Cu3 — frequently asked

Is AlSi7Mg0.6 stronger than AlSi9Cu3?

Yes. AlSi7Mg0.6 has a typical yield strength of 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) against 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) for AlSi9Cu3 — about 73% more. Tensile strength is 355 MPa (51.5 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AlSi7Mg0.6 or AlSi9Cu3?

AlSi9Cu3 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while AlSi7Mg0.6 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, AlSi7Mg0.6 or AlSi9Cu3?

AlSi7Mg0.6. Its weldability rates good (65/100) against poor (20/100) for AlSi9Cu3.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AlSi7Mg0.6 and AlSi9Cu3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.