Aluminum ACP 5080 vs Hokotol
Aluminum · grade comparison
Aluminum ACP 5080 and Hokotol are both aluminum grades, both mold quality al. Hokotol is the stronger of the two: yield strength 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for ACP 5080, about 4.4 times as much; tensile strength follows at 540 MPa (78.3 ksi) vs 172 MPa (24.9 ksi). Hokotol is the more ductile: elongation 6% versus 3% for ACP 5080, and Hokotol is harder (165 HB vs 65 HB). ACP 5080 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous). On the shop floor, ACP 5080 machines more easily (excellent vs very good), ACP 5080 welds better (fair vs poor), and ACP 5080 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Hokotol (premium, $$$).
ACP 5080Choose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.
HokotolChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.
ACP 5080 vs Hokotol: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all aluminum grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all aluminum grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Compressive Strength
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Hardness, Brinell
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)
Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Min Service Temperature
Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Castability
Brazeability / Solderability
Polishability
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Typical Recycled Content
Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | ACP 5080 | Hokotol |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$ Standard | $$$ Premium |
| Min. machined wall | 0.5 mm | 0.5 mm |
| Best machined surface | Ra 0.8 µm | Ra 0.8 µm |
Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.
ACP 5080 vs Hokotol — frequently asked
Is Hokotol stronger than ACP 5080?
Yes. Hokotol has a typical yield strength of 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for ACP 5080 — about 4.4 times as much. Tensile strength is 540 MPa (78.3 ksi) vs 172 MPa (24.9 ksi).
Which is cheaper, ACP 5080 or Hokotol?
ACP 5080 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Hokotol is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.
Which is easier to machine, ACP 5080 or Hokotol?
ACP 5080. Its machinability rates excellent (92/100) against very good (82/100) for Hokotol; for welding the order is ACP 5080 first (fair, 45/100) then Hokotol (poor, 18/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ACP 5080 and Hokotol side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.