FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum AC3A vs AC8B

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum AC3A and AC8B are both aluminum grades. AC8B is the stronger of the two: yield strength 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for AC3A, about 3.1 times as much; tensile strength follows at 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) vs 165 MPa (23.9 ksi). In exchange, AC3A is the more ductile: elongation 6% versus 1% for AC8B, and AC8B is harder (110 HB vs 50 HB). AC3A is lighter (2.66 g/cm³ vs 2.76 g/cm³ for AC8B) and AC8B is stiffer (82 GPa vs 71 GPa). On the shop floor, AC8B machines more easily (50 vs 40 out of 100) and AC3A welds better (very good vs poor).

AC3AChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

AC8BChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

AC3A vs AC8B: properties

AC3AAC8B

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
82 GPa11.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
31 GPa4.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
73 GPa10.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

165 MPa23.9 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

6%
1%

Shear Strength

115 MPa16.7 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

55 MPa8 ksi
82 MPa11.9 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

50 HB
110 HB

Compressive Strength

—
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.66 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.76 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

574°C1,065 °F
521°C970 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 582°C1,080 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
96 W/m·K55.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20.5 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F
20.7 µm/m·K11.5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
230°C446 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

33 % IACS
25 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in
6.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.78 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
38 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
50 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
200%

Weldability

80 / 100
22 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
—

Castability

95 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
75%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

62 kN·m/kg
101 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.7 MN·m/kg
29.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

40 kJ/m³
337 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

50.7 mm²/s
36.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

15
16

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAC3AAC8B

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAC3AAC8B
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

AC3A vs AC8B — frequently asked

Is AC8B stronger than AC3A?

Yes. AC8B has a typical yield strength of 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for AC3A — about 3.1 times as much. Tensile strength is 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) vs 165 MPa (23.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AC3A or AC8B?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, AC3A or AC8B?

AC8B, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 40/100 for AC3A; for welding the order is AC3A first (very good, 80/100) then AC8B (poor, 22/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AC3A and AC8B side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.