FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum AC3A vs AC8A

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum AC3A and AC8A are both aluminum grades. AC8A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for AC3A, about 3.2 times as much; tensile strength follows at 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) vs 165 MPa (23.9 ksi). In exchange, AC3A is the more ductile: elongation 6% versus 1% for AC8A, and AC8A is harder (115 HB vs 50 HB). AC8A is stiffer (82 GPa vs 71 GPa) and AC8A runs hotter in service (250°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, AC8A machines more easily (50 vs 40 out of 100) and AC3A welds better (very good vs poor).

AC3AChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

AC8AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

AC3A vs AC8A: properties

AC3AAC8A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
82 GPa11.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

165 MPa23.9 ksi
285 MPa41.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

6%
1%

Shear Strength

115 MPa16.7 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

55 MPa8 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in
16 MPa·√m14.6 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

3 J2.2 ft·lbf
3 J1.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

50 HB
115 HB

Compressive Strength

—
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
65 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
120 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.66 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

574°C1,065 °F
525°C977 °F

Liquidus Temperature

582°C1,080 °F
580°C1,076 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20.5 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F
19.5 µm/m·K10.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
470 J/g202 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
250°C482 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

33 % IACS
28 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in
6.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.44 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.78 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
36 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
50 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
45%

Weldability

80 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
4 / 100

Castability

95 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
20 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Typical Recycled Content

70%
60%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

62 kN·m/kg
106 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.7 MN·m/kg
30.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

40 kJ/m³
351 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

50.7 mm²/s
54.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

15
23

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAC3AAC8A

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAC3AAC8A
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

AC3A vs AC8A — frequently asked

Is AC8A stronger than AC3A?

Yes. AC8A has a typical yield strength of 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for AC3A — about 3.2 times as much. Tensile strength is 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) vs 165 MPa (23.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AC3A or AC8A?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, AC3A or AC8A?

AC8A, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 40/100 for AC3A; for welding the order is AC3A first (very good, 80/100) then AC8A (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AC3A and AC8A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.