FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6060 vs 6A02

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6060 and 6A02 are both aluminum grades. 6A02 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 6060, about 47% more; tensile strength follows at 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi). 6A02 is harder — 95 HB against 75 HB for 6060 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 6060 conducts heat better (200 W/m·K vs 165 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 6060 welds better (excellent vs very good), 6060 forms better (good vs fair), and 6060 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 6A02 (premium, $$$).

6060Choose it when it will be welded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

6A02Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

6060 vs 6A02: properties

60606A02

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

215 MPa31.2 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Shear Strength

140 MPa20.3 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
92 MPa13.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in
29 MPa·√m26.4 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

75 HB
95 HB

Hardness, Vickers

80 HV
100 HV

Reduction in Area

—
35%

Compressive Strength

—
255 MPa37 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
60 HRB

Same in both: Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Elongation at Break 12%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

600°C1,112 °F
585°C1,085 °F

Liquidus Temperature

655°C1,211 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Same in both: Density 2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F
165 W/m·K95.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

898 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
896 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
393 J/g169 BTU/lb

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

54 % IACS
43 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.26 µΩ·in
4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.57 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.8 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
62 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
72 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
40 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
65 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
190%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

80 kN·m/kg
119 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
25.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

209 kJ/m³
446 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

82.5 mm²/s
68.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

27
32

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale60606A02

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability60606A02
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

6060 vs 6A02 — frequently asked

Is 6A02 stronger than 6060?

Yes. 6A02 has a typical yield strength of 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 6060 — about 47% more. Tensile strength is 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6060 or 6A02?

6060 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 6A02 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 6060 or 6A02?

6A02, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 62/100 against 55/100 for 6060; for welding the order is 6060 first (excellent, 90/100) then 6A02 (very good, 72/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6060 and 6A02 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.