FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6060 vs 6951

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6060 and 6951 are both aluminum grades. 6060 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) against 41 MPa (5.95 ksi) for 6951, about 4.1 times as much; tensile strength follows at 215 MPa (31.2 ksi) vs 110 MPa (16 ksi). In exchange, 6951 is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 12% for 6060, and 6060 is harder (75 HB vs 28 HB). 6951 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, 6060 machines more easily (good vs fair), 6060 welds better (excellent vs very good), and 6060 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 6951 (premium, $$$).

6060Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

6951Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

6060 vs 6951: properties

60606951

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

215 MPa31.2 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
41 MPa5.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
30%

Shear Strength

140 MPa20.3 ksi
76 MPa11 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Brinell

75 HB
28 HB

Hardness, Vickers

80 HV
—

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

600°C1,112 °F
616°C1,141 °F

Liquidus Temperature

655°C1,211 °F
654°C1,209 °F

Same in both: Density 2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

898 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
393 J/g169 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

54 % IACS
50 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.26 µΩ·in
3.45×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.36 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.8 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
72 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
90 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
95 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
90%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

80 kN·m/kg
41 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

209 kJ/m³
12 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

82.5 mm²/s
82.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

27
14

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.6 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale60606951

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability60606951
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

6060 vs 6951 — frequently asked

Is 6060 stronger than 6951?

Yes. 6060 has a typical yield strength of 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) against 41 MPa (5.95 ksi) for 6951 — about 4.1 times as much. Tensile strength is 215 MPa (31.2 ksi) vs 110 MPa (16 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6060 or 6951?

6060 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 6951 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 6060 or 6951?

6060. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (40/100) for 6951; for welding the order is 6060 first (excellent, 90/100) then 6951 (very good, 72/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6060 and 6951 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.