FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6060 vs 6262

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6060 and 6262 are both aluminum grades. 6262 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 6060, about 62% more; tensile strength follows at 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi). 6262 is harder — 95 HB against 75 HB for 6060 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 6060 conducts heat better (200 W/m·K vs 172 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 6262 machines more easily (excellent vs good), 6060 welds better (excellent vs poor), and 6060 forms better (good vs fair).

6060Choose it when it will be welded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

6262Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

6060 vs 6262: properties

60606262

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

215 MPa31.2 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Shear Strength

140 MPa20.3 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Brinell

75 HB
95 HB

Hardness, Vickers

80 HV
105 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Elongation at Break 12%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.72 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

600°C1,112 °F
582°C1,080 °F

Liquidus Temperature

655°C1,211 °F
652°C1,206 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F
172 W/m·K99.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

898 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
895 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
393 J/g169 BTU/lb

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

54 % IACS
44 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.26 µΩ·in
3.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.54 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.8 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
65 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
90 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
35 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
60 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
180%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

35%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

80 kN·m/kg
114 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
25.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

209 kJ/m³
548 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

82.5 mm²/s
70.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

27
33

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale60606262

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability60606262
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

6060 vs 6262 — frequently asked

Is 6262 stronger than 6060?

Yes. 6262 has a typical yield strength of 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 6060 — about 62% more. Tensile strength is 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6060 or 6262?

6060 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 6262 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 6060 or 6262?

6262. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against good (55/100) for 6060; for welding the order is 6060 first (excellent, 90/100) then 6262 (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6060 and 6262 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.