FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6060 vs 6205

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6060 and 6205 are both aluminum grades. 6205 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 6060, about 71% more; tensile strength follows at 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi). 6205 is harder — 95 HB against 75 HB for 6060 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 6060 conducts heat better (200 W/m·K vs 172 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 6060 welds better (excellent vs very good), 6060 forms better (good vs fair), and 6060 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 6205 (standard, $$).

6060Choose it when it will be welded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

6205Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

6060 vs 6205: properties

60606205

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

215 MPa31.2 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
11%

Shear Strength

140 MPa20.3 ksi
193 MPa28 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
103 MPa14.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in
29 MPa·√m26.4 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

75 HB
95 HB

Hardness, Vickers

80 HV
100 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

600°C1,112 °F
607°C1,125 °F

Liquidus Temperature

655°C1,211 °F
652°C1,206 °F

Same in both: Density 2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F
172 W/m·K99.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

898 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
896 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 397 J/g171 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

54 % IACS
44 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.26 µΩ·in
3.92×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.54 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.76 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
52 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
72 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
35%

Same in both: Castability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

80 kN·m/kg
115 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

209 kJ/m³
609 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

82.5 mm²/s
71.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

27
33

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.6 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale60606205

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability60606205
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

6060 vs 6205 — frequently asked

Is 6205 stronger than 6060?

Yes. 6205 has a typical yield strength of 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 6060 — about 71% more. Tensile strength is 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6060 or 6205?

6060 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 6205 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 6060 or 6205?

6060. Its weldability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (72/100) for 6205.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6060 and 6205 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.