FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6060 vs 6101A

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6060 and 6101A are both aluminum grades. 6101A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 6060, about 15% more. 6101A is the more ductile: elongation 14% versus 12% for 6060, and 6060 is harder (75 HB vs 71 HB). On the shop floor, 6060 machines more easily (good vs fair) and 6060 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 6101A (standard, $$).

6060Choose it when the part is machined in volume, or when cost is the deciding factor.

6101AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

6060 vs 6101A: properties

60606101A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

215 MPa31.2 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
14%

Shear Strength

140 MPa20.3 ksi
138 MPa20 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Brinell

75 HB
71 HB

Hardness, Vickers

80 HV
75 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

600°C1,112 °F
621°C1,150 °F

Liquidus Temperature

655°C1,211 °F
654°C1,209 °F

Same in both: Density 2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F
218 W/m·K126 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

898 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
895 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 397 J/g171 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

54 % IACS
57 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.26 µΩ·in
3.02×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.19 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.8 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
85 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
—

Polishability

80 / 100
65 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
40%

Same in both: Formability (cold) 55 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

35%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

80 kN·m/kg
81 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

209 kJ/m³
276 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

82.5 mm²/s
90.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

27
30

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.6 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale60606101A

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability60606101A
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

6060 vs 6101A — frequently asked

Is 6101A stronger than 6060?

Yes. 6101A has a typical yield strength of 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 6060 — about 15% more. Tensile strength is 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6060 or 6101A?

6060 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 6101A is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 6060 or 6101A?

6060. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (40/100) for 6101A; for welding the order is 6060 first (excellent, 90/100) then 6101A (excellent, 85/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6060 and 6101A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.