FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6025 vs 6060

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6025 and 6060 are both aluminum grades. 6025 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 205 MPa (29.7 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 6060, about 21% more; tensile strength follows at 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi). 6060 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous) and 6060 conducts heat better (200 W/m·K vs 145 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 6060 machines more easily (good vs fair), 6060 welds better (excellent vs very good), and 6060 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 6025 (premium, $$$).

6025Choose it when strength drives the design.

6060Choose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

6025 vs 6060: properties

60256060

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

205 MPa29.7 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Shear Strength

155 MPa22.5 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

28 MPa·√m25.5 ksi·√in
30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

72 HB
75 HB

Hardness, Vickers

—
80 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Elongation at Break 12%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.69 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

590°C1,094 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Liquidus Temperature

650°C1,202 °F
655°C1,211 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

145 W/m·K83.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
898 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

395 J/g170 BTU/lb
397 J/g171 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

34 % IACS
54 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.07×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2 µΩ·in
3.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.26 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.85 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

120%
—

Weldability

75 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
80 / 100

Castability

—
25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
13 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

97 kN·m/kg
80 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26 MN·m/kg
25.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

300 kJ/m³
209 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

59.9 mm²/s
82.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

23
27

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale60606025

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability60256060
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

6025 vs 6060 — frequently asked

Is 6025 stronger than 6060?

Yes. 6025 has a typical yield strength of 205 MPa (29.7 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 6060 — about 21% more. Tensile strength is 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6025 or 6060?

6060 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 6025 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 6025 or 6060?

6060. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (45/100) for 6025; for welding the order is 6060 first (excellent, 90/100) then 6025 (very good, 75/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6025 and 6060 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.