FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6014 vs 6060

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6014 and 6060 are both aluminum grades. 6060 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for 6014, about 42% more. In exchange, 6014 is the more ductile: elongation 27% versus 12% for 6060, and 6060 is harder (75 HB vs 60 HB). 6060 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous) and 6060 conducts electricity better (54 % IACS vs 46 % IACS). On the shop floor, 6060 welds better (excellent vs very good) and 6060 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 6014 (premium, $$$).

6014Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

6060Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

6014 vs 6060: properties

60146060

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

220 MPa31.9 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

27%
12%

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

60 HB
75 HB

Hardness, Vickers

65 HV
80 HV

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Shear Strength 140 MPa20.3 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

650°C1,202 °F
655°C1,211 °F

Same in both: Density 2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 600°C1,112 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

185 W/m·K107 BTU/hr·ft·°F
200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
898 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 397 J/g171 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

46 % IACS
54 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.75×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.48 µΩ·in
3.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.26 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.75 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

65 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

75 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

92 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
80 / 100

Castability

—
25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
13 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
35%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

81 kN·m/kg
80 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

104 kJ/m³
209 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

76.1 mm²/s
82.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

25
27

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.6 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale60606014

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability60146060
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

6014 vs 6060 — frequently asked

Is 6060 stronger than 6014?

Yes. 6060 has a typical yield strength of 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for 6014 — about 42% more. Tensile strength is 215 MPa (31.2 ksi) vs 220 MPa (31.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6014 or 6060?

6060 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 6014 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 6014 or 6060?

6060. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (50/100) for 6014; for welding the order is 6060 first (excellent, 90/100) then 6014 (very good, 75/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6014 and 6060 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.