FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6003 vs 6060

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6003 and 6060 are both aluminum grades. 6003 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 205 MPa (29.7 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 6060, about 21% more; tensile strength follows at 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi). In exchange, 6060 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 10% for 6003. 6060 conducts heat better (200 W/m·K vs 175 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 6060 welds better (excellent vs very good) and 6060 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 6003 (standard, $$).

6003Choose it when strength drives the design.

6060Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

6003 vs 6060: properties

60036060

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

205 MPa29.7 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
12%

Compressive Strength

205 MPa29.7 ksi
—

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

29 MPa·√m26.4 ksi·√in
30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

82 HV
80 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Hardness, Brinell 75 HB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

615°C1,139 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Same in both: Density 2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Liquidus Temperature 655°C1,211 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

175 W/m·K101 BTU/hr·ft·°F
200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

897 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
898 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 397 J/g171 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

45 % IACS
54 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.83×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.51 µΩ·in
3.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.26 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.8 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

35%
—

Weldability

80 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

50 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
13 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

89 kN·m/kg
80 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

305 kJ/m³
209 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

72.3 mm²/s
82.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

26
27

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.6 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale60606003

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability60036060
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

6003 vs 6060 — frequently asked

Is 6003 stronger than 6060?

Yes. 6003 has a typical yield strength of 205 MPa (29.7 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 6060 — about 21% more. Tensile strength is 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6003 or 6060?

6060 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 6003 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 6003 or 6060?

6060. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (50/100) for 6003; for welding the order is 6060 first (excellent, 90/100) then 6003 (very good, 80/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6003 and 6060 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.