FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 5056 vs 5182

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 5056 and 5182 are both aluminum grades, both corrosion resistant al. 5056 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) against 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) for 5182, about 81% more; tensile strength follows at 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi). 5056 is harder — 78 HB against 70 HB for 5182 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. On the shop floor, 5056 machines more easily (good vs fair) and 5182 forms better (excellent vs good).

5056Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

5056 vs 5182: properties

50565182

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
26 GPa3.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

330 MPa47.9 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

235 MPa34.1 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
21%

Shear Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

145 MPa21 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

78 HB
70 HB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 70 GPa10.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.64 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.65 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

568°C1,054 °F
577°C1,071 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 638°C1,180 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

112 W/m·K64.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
123 W/m·K71.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

904 J/kg·K0.22 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

395 J/g170 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 24.1 µm/m·K13.4 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 65°C149 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

28 % IACS
31 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.15×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.42 µΩ·in
5.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.87 V
-0.86 V

Corrosion Resistance

76 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
30%

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
88 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 85 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Typical Recycled Content

30%
55%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

125 kN·m/kg
104 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.9 MN·m/kg
26.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

389 kJ/m³
121 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

46.9 mm²/s
51.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

22
20

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale50565182

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability50565182
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

5056 vs 5182 — frequently asked

Is 5056 stronger than 5182?

Yes. 5056 has a typical yield strength of 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) against 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) for 5182 — about 81% more. Tensile strength is 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 5056 or 5182?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 5056 or 5182?

5056. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (40/100) for 5182.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5056 and 5182 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.