FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 5056 vs 5251

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 5056 and 5251 are both aluminum grades, both corrosion resistant al. 5056 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) against 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) for 5251, about 57% more; tensile strength follows at 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 210 MPa (30.5 ksi). 5056 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 10% for 5251, and 5056 is harder (78 HB vs 57 HB). 5251 runs hotter in service (120°C vs 65°C continuous) and 5251 conducts heat better (155 W/m·K vs 112 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 5056 machines more easily (good vs fair) and 5251 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 5056 (standard, $$).

5056Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

5251Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

5056 vs 5251: properties

50565251

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
26 GPa3.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

330 MPa47.9 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

235 MPa34.1 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
10%

Shear Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

145 MPa21 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

78 HB
57 HB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 70 GPa10.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.64 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.69 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

568°C1,054 °F
607°C1,125 °F

Liquidus Temperature

638°C1,180 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

112 W/m·K64.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
155 W/m·K89.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

904 J/kg·K0.22 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

24.1 µm/m·K13.4 µin/in·°F
23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

65°C149 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 395 J/g170 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

28 % IACS
34 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.15×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.42 µΩ·in
5.1×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.01 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.87 V
-0.86 V

Corrosion Resistance

76 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
35%

Weldability

85 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
72 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

125 kN·m/kg
78 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.9 MN·m/kg
26 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

389 kJ/m³
161 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

46.9 mm²/s
64 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

22
20

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale50565251

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability50565251
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

5056 vs 5251 — frequently asked

Is 5056 stronger than 5251?

Yes. 5056 has a typical yield strength of 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) against 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) for 5251 — about 57% more. Tensile strength is 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 210 MPa (30.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 5056 or 5251?

5251 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 5056 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 5056 or 5251?

5056. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (45/100) for 5251.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5056 and 5251 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.