FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 5050 vs 5056

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 5050 and 5056 are both aluminum grades, both corrosion resistant al. 5056 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) against 145 MPa (21 ksi) for 5050, about 62% more; tensile strength follows at 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 170 MPa (24.7 ksi). 5056 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 9% for 5050, and 5056 is harder (78 HB vs 46 HB). 5050 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 65°C continuous) and 5050 conducts heat better (191 W/m·K vs 112 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 5056 machines more easily (good vs fair) and 5050 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 5056 (standard, $$).

5050Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

5056Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

5050 vs 5056: properties

50505056

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

68.9 GPa10 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

25.9 GPa3.8 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

75 GPa10.9 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

145 MPa21 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

9%
20%

Shear Strength

115 MPa16.7 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

46 HB
78 HB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.69 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.64 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

627°C1,161 °F
568°C1,054 °F

Liquidus Temperature

652°C1,206 °F
638°C1,180 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

191 W/m·K110 BTU/hr·ft·°F
112 W/m·K64.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
904 J/kg·K0.22 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F
24.1 µm/m·K13.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
395 J/g170 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
65°C149 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

50 % IACS
28 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.45×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.36 µΩ·in
6.15×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.42 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.87 V

Corrosion Resistance

75 / 100
76 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
40%

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 85 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

35%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

63 kN·m/kg
125 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
26.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

153 kJ/m³
389 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

78.9 mm²/s
46.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

20
22

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale50505056

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability50505056
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

5050 vs 5056 — frequently asked

Is 5056 stronger than 5050?

Yes. 5056 has a typical yield strength of 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) against 145 MPa (21 ksi) for 5050 — about 62% more. Tensile strength is 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 170 MPa (24.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 5050 or 5056?

5050 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 5056 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 5050 or 5056?

5056. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (40/100) for 5050.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5050 and 5056 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.