Aluminum 5052 vs 5A02
Aluminum · grade comparison
Aluminum 5052 and 5A02 are both aluminum grades. 5052 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 85 MPa (12.3 ksi) for 5A02, about 129% more; tensile strength follows at 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) vs 180 MPa (26.1 ksi). In exchange, 5A02 is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 12% for 5052, and 5052 is harder (60 HB vs 47 HB). On the shop floor, 5052 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and 5052 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 5A02 (premium, $$$).
5052Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.
5A02Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.
5052 vs 5A02: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all aluminum grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all aluminum grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Vickers
Same in both: Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Liquidus Temperature
Same in both: Density 2.68 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 607°C1,125 °F
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Specific Heat Capacity
Latent Heat of Fusion
Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 138 W/m·K79.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Resistivity
Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 35 % IACS
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Brazeability / Solderability
Polishability
Castability
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | 5052 | 5A02 |
|---|---|---|
| CNC machining | Yes | — |
| Sheet metal | Yes | — |
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $ Budget | $$$ Premium |
| Min. machined wall | 0.5 mm | — |
| Best machined surface | Ra 0.8 µm | — |
| Anodizing Type II | Yes | — |
| Cerakote | Yes | — |
| Chem Film (Alodine) | Yes | — |
| DLC | Yes | — |
| E-Coating | Yes | — |
| Electropolishing | Yes | — |
| Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE | Yes | — |
| Hard Anodizing Type III | Yes | — |
| Nickel Plating | Yes | — |
| PTFE Coating | Yes | — |
| Painting | Yes | — |
| Powder Coating | Yes | — |
They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.
5052 vs 5A02 — frequently asked
Is 5052 stronger than 5A02?
Yes. 5052 has a typical yield strength of 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 85 MPa (12.3 ksi) for 5A02 — about 129% more. Tensile strength is 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) vs 180 MPa (26.1 ksi).
Which is cheaper, 5052 or 5A02?
5052 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 5A02 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.
Which is easier to machine, 5052 or 5A02?
5052. Its machinability rates fair (50/100) against poor (30/100) for 5A02; for welding the order is 5052 first (excellent, 90/100) then 5A02 (excellent, 85/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5052 and 5A02 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.