FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 357-T6 vs 357-T61

Aluminum · 357 temper comparison

357-T6 and 357-T61 are two conditions of the same aluminum grade, 357: T6 (solution heat treated and artificially aged) versus T61 (T6 variant, underaged). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 357-T61 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for 357-T6, about 5% more; tensile strength follows at 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) vs 330 MPa (47.9 ksi). 357-T61 is harder — 100 HB against 90 HB for 357-T6 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads.

357-T61Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

357-T6 vs 357-T61: properties

357-T6357-T61

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

330 MPa47.9 ksi
360 MPa52.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Shear Strength

225 MPa32.6 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

90 HB
100 HB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 72 GPa10.4 Msi · Shear Modulus 27 GPa3.9 Msi · Bulk Modulus 70 GPa10.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Elongation at Break 5% · Compressive Strength 280 MPa40.6 ksi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 24 MPa·√m21.8 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 2.68 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 557°C1,035 °F · Liquidus Temperature 613°C1,135 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 152 W/m·K87.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 39 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.83 V · Corrosion Resistance 58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

68 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 85 / 100 · Formability (cold) 10 / 100 · Castability 92 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 30 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale357

357-T6 vs 357-T61 — frequently asked

Is 357-T61 stronger than 357-T6?

Yes. 357-T61 has a typical yield strength of 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for 357-T6 — about 5% more. Tensile strength is 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) vs 330 MPa (47.9 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, T6 or T61?

Specify the condition in the material field or the drawing note; FabDigit prices the quote for the state you call out.

When should I choose 357-T6 over 357-T61?

Pick 357-T61 when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 357-T6 and 357-T61 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.