FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 355 vs A360

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 355 and A360 are both aluminum grades, both cast al. 355 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) for A360, about 9% more. In exchange, A360 is the more ductile: elongation 3.5% versus 3% for 355, and 355 is harder (85 HB vs 75 HB). 355 runs hotter in service (175°C vs 150°C continuous) and 355 conducts heat better (151 W/m·K vs 113 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 355 welds better (good vs fair).

355Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

A360Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

355 vs A360: properties

355A360

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
317 MPa46 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
3.5%

Shear Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
138 MPa20 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
75 HB

Compressive Strength

—
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
4 J3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Vickers

—
82 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Shear Modulus 26.5 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.63 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

546°C1,015 °F
557°C1,035 °F

Liquidus Temperature

621°C1,150 °F
596°C1,105 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
113 W/m·K65.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F
21 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

36 % IACS
29 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in
5.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.32 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
—

Weldability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
92 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

80%
70%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

92 kN·m/kg
121 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.2 MN·m/kg
27 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

228 kJ/m³
192 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

57.9 mm²/s
44.6 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 24

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale355A360

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability355A360
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

355 vs A360 — frequently asked

Is 355 stronger than A360?

Yes. 355 has a typical yield strength of 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) for A360 — about 9% more. Tensile strength is 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) vs 317 MPa (46 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 355 or A360?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 355 or A360?

355, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 62/100 against 55/100 for A360; for welding the order is 355 first (good, 55/100) then A360 (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 355 and A360 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.