FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 355 vs 535

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 355 and 535 are both aluminum grades, both cast al. 355 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for 535, about 29% more. In exchange, 535 is the more ductile: elongation 13% versus 3% for 355, and 355 is harder (85 HB vs 70 HB). 535 is lighter (2.62 g/cm³ vs 2.71 g/cm³ for 355) and 355 runs hotter in service (175°C vs 100°C continuous). On the shop floor, 535 machines more easily (excellent vs good), 535 welds better (very good vs good), and 355 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 535 (standard, $$).

355Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

535Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

355 vs 535: properties

355535

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
26 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
13%

Shear Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
70 HB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.62 g/cm³0.09 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

546°C1,015 °F
549°C1,020 °F

Liquidus Temperature

621°C1,150 °F
632°C1,170 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

151 W/m·K87.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
96 W/m·K55.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F
24.5 µm/m·K13.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
100°C212 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

36 % IACS
24 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.89 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.83 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.87 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
85 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
300%

Weldability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
—

Castability

85 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

80%
20%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

92 kN·m/kg
105 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.2 MN·m/kg
27.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

228 kJ/m³
138 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

57.9 mm²/s
40.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
15

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale355535

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability355535
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

355 vs 535 — frequently asked

Is 355 stronger than 535?

Yes. 355 has a typical yield strength of 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for 535 — about 29% more. Tensile strength is 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 355 or 535?

355 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 535 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 355 or 535?

535. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against good (62/100) for 355; for welding the order is 535 first (very good, 70/100) then 355 (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 355 and 535 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.