FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 319 vs B390.0

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 319 and B390.0 are both aluminum grades. B390.0 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319, about 94% more; tensile strength follows at 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi). In exchange, 319 is the more ductile: elongation 2% versus 1% for B390.0, and B390.0 is harder (120 HB vs 70 HB). B390.0 is stiffer (81 GPa vs 74 GPa) and B390.0 conducts heat better (134 W/m·K vs 109 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 319 machines more easily (very good vs poor), 319 welds better (good vs poor), and 319 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than B390.0 (standard, $$).

319Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

B390.0Choose it when strength drives the design.

319 vs B390.0: properties

319B390.0

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
81 GPa11.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

27.5 GPa4 Msi
30.5 GPa4.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
79 GPa11.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

186 MPa27 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
1%

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

69 MPa10 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

19 MPa·√m17.3 ksi·√in
14 MPa·√m12.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J3 ft·lbf
2 J1.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
120 HB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.73 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

521°C970 °F
507°C945 °F

Liquidus Temperature

604°C1,119 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F
134 W/m·K77.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
860 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
470 J/g202 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 27 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.76 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
25 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

130%
30%

Weldability

55 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 5 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

75%
90%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

67 kN·m/kg
103 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
29.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

104 kJ/m³
356 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.6 mm²/s
57.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
26

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale319B390.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability319B390.0
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

319 vs B390.0 — frequently asked

Is B390.0 stronger than 319?

Yes. B390.0 has a typical yield strength of 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319 — about 94% more. Tensile strength is 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 319 or B390.0?

319 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while B390.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 319 or B390.0?

319. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against poor (25/100) for B390.0; for welding the order is 319 first (good, 55/100) then B390.0 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 319 and B390.0 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.