FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 319 vs 393.0

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 319 and 393.0 are both aluminum grades. 393.0 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319, about 122% more; tensile strength follows at 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi). In exchange, 319 is the more ductile: elongation 2% versus 0.7% for 393.0, and 393.0 is harder (140 HB vs 70 HB). 393.0 is lighter (2.7 g/cm³ vs 2.79 g/cm³ for 319) and 393.0 is stiffer (88 GPa vs 74 GPa). On the shop floor, 319 machines more easily (very good vs poor), 319 welds better (good vs poor), and 319 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 393.0 (standard, $$).

319Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

393.0Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

319 vs 393.0: properties

319393.0

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
88 GPa12.8 Msi

Shear Modulus

27.5 GPa4 Msi
33 GPa4.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

186 MPa27 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
0.7%

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

69 MPa10 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

19 MPa·√m17.3 ksi·√in
13 MPa·√m11.8 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J3 ft·lbf
2 J1.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
140 HB

Reduction in Area

—
1%

Compressive Strength

—
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
76 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
147 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 72 GPa10.4 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

521°C970 °F
555°C1,031 °F

Liquidus Temperature

604°C1,119 °F
705°C1,301 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F
130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
960 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
15.8 µm/m·K8.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
500 J/g215 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
250°C482 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
24 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.83 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.81 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
43 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
22 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

130%
20%

Weldability

55 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 5 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
190 MJ/kg81,685 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

75%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

67 kN·m/kg
107 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
32.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

104 kJ/m³
430 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.6 mm²/s
50.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
27

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale319393.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability319393.0
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

319 vs 393.0 — frequently asked

Is 393.0 stronger than 319?

Yes. 393.0 has a typical yield strength of 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319 — about 122% more. Tensile strength is 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 319 or 393.0?

319 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 393.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 319 or 393.0?

319. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against poor (22/100) for 393.0; for welding the order is 319 first (good, 55/100) then 393.0 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 319 and 393.0 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.