FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2618A-O vs 2618A-T4

Aluminum · 2618A temper comparison

2618A-O and 2618A-T4 are two conditions of the same aluminum grade, 2618A: O (annealed) versus T4 (solution heat treated and naturally aged). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 2618A-T4 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) against 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) for 2618A-O, about 85% more; tensile strength follows at 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) vs 240 MPa (34.8 ksi). In exchange, 2618A-O is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 16% for 2618A-T4, and 2618A-T4 is harder (95 HB vs 65 HB). 2618A-O runs hotter in service (200°C vs 100°C continuous) and 2618A-O conducts heat better (160 W/m·K vs 130 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 2618A-T4 machines more easily (good vs fair).

2618A-OChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

2618A-T4Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

2618A-O vs 2618A-T4: properties

2618A-O2618A-T4

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

18%
16%

Reduction in Area

30%
24%

Compressive Strength

135 MPa19.6 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

36 MPa·√m32.8 ksi·√in
34 MPa·√m30.9 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

18 J13.3 ft·lbf
15 J11.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
95 HB

Hardness, Vickers

70 HV
100 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 74 GPa10.7 Msi · Shear Modulus 27.5 GPa4 Msi · Bulk Modulus 72 GPa10.4 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 2.76 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 502°C936 °F · Liquidus Temperature 638°C1,180 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

160 W/m·K92.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
100°C212 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 875 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 22.3 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

44 % IACS
34 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.92×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.54 µΩ·in
5.07×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

36 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.72 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
62 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

32%
48%

Weldability

20 / 100
18 / 100

Formability (cold)

50 / 100
30 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 15 / 100 · Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 14 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 12%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale2618A

2618A-O vs 2618A-T4 — frequently asked

Is 2618A-T4 stronger than 2618A-O?

Yes. 2618A-T4 has a typical yield strength of 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) against 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) for 2618A-O — about 85% more. Tensile strength is 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) vs 240 MPa (34.8 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, O or T4?

T851 is the default 2618A condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither O nor T4). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, 2618A-O or 2618A-T4?

2618A-T4. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against fair (45/100) for 2618A-O.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2618A-O and 2618A-T4 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.