FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2618A-T4 vs 2618A-T61

Aluminum · 2618A temper comparison

2618A-T4 and 2618A-T61 are two conditions of the same aluminum grade, 2618A: T4 (solution heat treated and naturally aged) versus T61 (T6 variant, underaged). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 2618A-T61 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for 2618A-T4, about 54% more; tensile strength follows at 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) vs 380 MPa (55.1 ksi). In exchange, 2618A-T4 is the more ductile: elongation 16% versus 10% for 2618A-T61, and 2618A-T61 is harder (115 HB vs 95 HB). 2618A-T61 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 100°C continuous) and 2618A-T61 conducts heat better (146 W/m·K vs 130 W/m·K).

2618A-T4Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

2618A-T61Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

2618A-T4 vs 2618A-T61: properties

2618A-T42618A-T61

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

380 MPa55.1 ksi
440 MPa63.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
370 MPa53.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

16%
10%

Reduction in Area

24%
20%

Compressive Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Shear Strength

230 MPa33.4 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

110 MPa16 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

34 MPa·√m30.9 ksi·√in
30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

15 J11.1 ft·lbf
9 J6.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

95 HB
115 HB

Hardness, Vickers

100 HV
122 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 74 GPa10.7 Msi · Shear Modulus 27.5 GPa4 Msi · Bulk Modulus 72 GPa10.4 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 2.76 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 502°C936 °F · Liquidus Temperature 638°C1,180 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
146 W/m·K84.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 875 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 22.3 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

34 % IACS
39 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.07×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2 µΩ·in
4.42×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.74 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

25 / 100
32 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.72 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
68 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

48%
55%

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
22 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 18 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 15 / 100 · Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 14 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 12%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale2618A

2618A-T4 vs 2618A-T61 — frequently asked

Is 2618A-T61 stronger than 2618A-T4?

Yes. 2618A-T61 has a typical yield strength of 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for 2618A-T4 — about 54% more. Tensile strength is 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) vs 380 MPa (55.1 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, T4 or T61?

T851 is the default 2618A condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither T4 nor T61). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, 2618A-T4 or 2618A-T61?

2618A-T61, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 68/100 against 62/100 for 2618A-T4.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2618A-T4 and 2618A-T61 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.