FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2319 vs ER4045

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 2319 and ER4045 are both aluminum grades. 2319 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) for ER4045, about 83% more; tensile strength follows at 200 MPa (29 ksi) vs 165 MPa (23.9 ksi). 2319 is the more ductile: elongation 16% versus 12% for ER4045, and 2319 is harder (60 HB vs 45 HB). ER4045 is lighter (2.67 g/cm³ vs 2.84 g/cm³ for 2319) and 2319 runs hotter in service (175°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, 2319 machines more easily (good vs fair).

2319Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

ER4045Choose it when weight is the constraint.

2319 vs ER4045: properties

2319ER4045

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

73 GPa10.6 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

200 MPa29 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

16%
12%

Shear Strength

130 MPa18.9 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

32 MPa·√m29.1 ksi·√in
18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

60 HB
45 HB

Reduction in Area

—
15%

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
5 J3.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
12 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
48 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 75 GPa10.9 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.84 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

543°C1,009 °F
577°C1,071 °F

Liquidus Temperature

643°C1,189 °F
591°C1,096 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

170 W/m·K98.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
165 W/m·K95.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

864 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.3 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F
21.3 µm/m·K11.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

385 J/g166 BTU/lb
490 J/g211 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-253°C-423 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

44 % IACS
41 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.54 µΩ·in
4.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.65 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.64 V
-0.8 V

Corrosion Resistance

32 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
42 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

55%
70%

Castability

60 / 100
88 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
96 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
38 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 92 / 100 · Formability (cold) 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

70 kN·m/kg
62 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.7 MN·m/kg
26.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

83 kJ/m³
25 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

69.3 mm²/s
70.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

21
18

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale2319ER4045

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability2319ER4045
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

2319 vs ER4045 — frequently asked

Is 2319 stronger than ER4045?

Yes. 2319 has a typical yield strength of 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) for ER4045 — about 83% more. Tensile strength is 200 MPa (29 ksi) vs 165 MPa (23.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 2319 or ER4045?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 2319 or ER4045?

2319. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against fair (42/100) for ER4045.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2319 and ER4045 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.