FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2095-O vs 2095-T851

Aluminum · 2095 temper comparison

2095-O and 2095-T851 are two conditions of the same aluminum grade, 2095: O (annealed) versus T851 (T8, stress relieved by stretching). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 2095-T851 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for 2095-O, about 4.2 times as much; tensile strength follows at 630 MPa (91.4 ksi) vs 265 MPa (38.4 ksi). In exchange, 2095-O is the more ductile: elongation 17% versus 7% for 2095-T851, and 2095-T851 is harder (170 HB vs 65 HB). 2095-O runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous) and 2095-O conducts heat better (120 W/m·K vs 88 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 2095-T851 machines more easily (good vs fair) and 2095-O welds better (very good vs good).

2095-OChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

2095-T851Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

2095-O vs 2095-T851: properties

2095-O2095-T851

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

265 MPa38.4 ksi
630 MPa91.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

140 MPa20.3 ksi
585 MPa84.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

17%
7%

Compressive Strength

145 MPa21 ksi
600 MPa87 ksi

Shear Strength

160 MPa23.2 ksi
370 MPa53.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

33 MPa·√m30 ksi·√in
34 MPa·√m30.9 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
170 HB

Hardness, Vickers

70 HV
183 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 78 GPa11.3 Msi · Shear Modulus 29.5 GPa4.3 Msi · Bulk Modulus 76 GPa11 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 560°C1,040 °F · Liquidus Temperature 640°C1,184 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

120 W/m·K69.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
88 W/m·K50.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -253°C-423 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

35 % IACS
26 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.93 µΩ·in
6.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.7 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
65 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

90%
125%

Weldability

70 / 100
58 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
18 / 100

Same in both: Castability 25 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 12 / 100 · Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 215 MJ/kg92,433 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 13.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 5%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale2095

2095-O vs 2095-T851 — frequently asked

Is 2095-T851 stronger than 2095-O?

Yes. 2095-T851 has a typical yield strength of 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for 2095-O — about 4.2 times as much. Tensile strength is 630 MPa (91.4 ksi) vs 265 MPa (38.4 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, O or T851?

T8 is the default 2095 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither O nor T851). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, 2095-O or 2095-T851?

2095-T851. Its machinability rates good (65/100) against fair (45/100) for 2095-O; for welding the order is 2095-O first (very good, 70/100) then 2095-T851 (good, 58/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2095-O and 2095-T851 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.