FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2095-O vs 2095-T3

Aluminum · 2095 temper comparison

2095-O and 2095-T3 are two conditions of the same aluminum grade, 2095: O (annealed) versus T3 (solution heat treated, cold worked and naturally aged). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 2095-T3 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for 2095-O, about 171% more; tensile strength follows at 505 MPa (73.2 ksi) vs 265 MPa (38.4 ksi). In exchange, 2095-O is the more ductile: elongation 17% versus 13% for 2095-T3, and 2095-T3 is harder (130 HB vs 65 HB). 2095-O runs hotter in service (200°C vs 100°C continuous) and 2095-O conducts heat better (120 W/m·K vs 76 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 2095-T3 machines more easily (good vs fair) and 2095-O welds better (very good vs good).

2095-OChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

2095-T3Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

2095-O vs 2095-T3: properties

2095-O2095-T3

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

265 MPa38.4 ksi
505 MPa73.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

140 MPa20.3 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

17%
13%

Compressive Strength

145 MPa21 ksi
390 MPa56.6 ksi

Shear Strength

160 MPa23.2 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

33 MPa·√m30 ksi·√in
40 MPa·√m36.4 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
130 HB

Hardness, Vickers

70 HV
140 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 78 GPa11.3 Msi · Shear Modulus 29.5 GPa4.3 Msi · Bulk Modulus 76 GPa11 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 560°C1,040 °F · Liquidus Temperature 640°C1,184 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

120 W/m·K69.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
76 W/m·K43.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
100°C212 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -253°C-423 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

35 % IACS
22 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.93 µΩ·in
7.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.07 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
30 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.7 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

90%
105%

Weldability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Castability 25 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 12 / 100 · Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 215 MJ/kg92,433 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 13.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 5%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale2095

2095-O vs 2095-T3 — frequently asked

Is 2095-T3 stronger than 2095-O?

Yes. 2095-T3 has a typical yield strength of 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for 2095-O — about 171% more. Tensile strength is 505 MPa (73.2 ksi) vs 265 MPa (38.4 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, O or T3?

T8 is the default 2095 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither O nor T3). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, 2095-O or 2095-T3?

2095-T3. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (45/100) for 2095-O; for welding the order is 2095-O first (very good, 70/100) then 2095-T3 (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2095-O and 2095-T3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.