FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 1080 vs 1350

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 1080 and 1350 are both aluminum grades, both electrical conductive al. 1350 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) against 25 MPa (3.63 ksi) for 1080, about 6.6 times as much; tensile strength follows at 186 MPa (27 ksi) vs 70 MPa (10.2 ksi). In exchange, 1080 is the more ductile: elongation 43% versus 1.7% for 1350, and 1350 is harder (45 HB vs 20 HB). 1080 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 90°C continuous). On the shop floor, 1350 machines more easily (fair vs poor).

1080Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

1350Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

1080 vs 1350: properties

10801350

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
186 MPa27 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

25 MPa3.6 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

43%
1.7%

Shear Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

20 MPa2.9 ksi
51 MPa7.4 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

20 HB
45 HB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 75 GPa10.9 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 646°C1,195 °F · Liquidus Temperature 657°C1,215 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

231 W/m·K133 BTU/hr·ft·°F
230 W/m·K133 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
90°C194 °F

Min Service Temperature

-270°C-454 °F
-250°C-418 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 397 J/g171 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

59.5 % IACS
61.4 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.14 µΩ·in
2.81×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.11 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.85 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
90%

Formability (cold)

98 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

95 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 90 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
8%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

26 kN·m/kg
69 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
25.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

5 kJ/m³
197 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

95.1 mm²/s
94.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
26

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale10801350

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability10801350
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

1080 vs 1350 — frequently asked

Is 1350 stronger than 1080?

Yes. 1350 has a typical yield strength of 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) against 25 MPa (3.63 ksi) for 1080 — about 6.6 times as much. Tensile strength is 186 MPa (27 ksi) vs 70 MPa (10.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1080 or 1350?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 1080 or 1350?

1350. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (30/100) for 1080.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1080 and 1350 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.