FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 1050 vs 5352

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 1050 and 5352 are both aluminum grades, both corrosion resistant al. 5352 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for 1050, about 117% more; tensile strength follows at 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) vs 110 MPa (16 ksi). 5352 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 5% for 1050, and 5352 is harder (60 HB vs 30 HB). 1050 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous) and 1050 conducts heat better (229 W/m·K vs 138 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 5352 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and 1050 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 5352 (standard, $$).

1050Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

5352Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1050 vs 5352: properties

10505352

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70.3 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

26 GPa3.8 Msi
25.9 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

75 GPa10.9 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

110 MPa16 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
12%

Shear Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
115 MPa16.7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

30 HB
60 HB

Hardness, Vickers

33 HV
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.68 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

646°C1,195 °F
607°C1,125 °F

Liquidus Temperature

657°C1,215 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

229 W/m·K132 BTU/hr·ft·°F
138 W/m·K79.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
120°C248 °F

Min Service Temperature

-270°C-454 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 397 J/g171 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

61 % IACS
35 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.83×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.11 µΩ·in
4.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.93 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.84 V
-0.85 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
75 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
42 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
40%

Weldability

92 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

85 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

78 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
86 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

59 kJ/m³
270 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

94.1 mm²/s
57.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

15
19

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale10505352

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability10505352
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

1050 vs 5352 — frequently asked

Is 5352 stronger than 1050?

Yes. 5352 has a typical yield strength of 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for 1050 — about 117% more. Tensile strength is 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) vs 110 MPa (16 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1050 or 5352?

1050 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 5352 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 1050 or 5352?

5352. Its machinability rates fair (42/100) against poor (30/100) for 1050.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1050 and 5352 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.