FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 1050 vs 1070

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 1050 and 1070 are both aluminum grades. 1050 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) against 25 MPa (3.63 ksi) for 1070, about 3.6 times as much; tensile strength follows at 110 MPa (16 ksi) vs 68 MPa (9.86 ksi). In exchange, 1070 is the more ductile: elongation 43% versus 5% for 1050, and 1050 is harder (30 HB vs 19 HB).

1050Choose it when strength drives the design.

1070Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1050 vs 1070: properties

10501070

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

75 GPa10.9 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

110 MPa16 ksi
68 MPa9.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
43%

Shear Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
20 MPa2.9 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

30 HB
19 HB

Hardness, Vickers

33 HV
—

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 646°C1,195 °F · Liquidus Temperature 657°C1,215 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

229 W/m·K132 BTU/hr·ft·°F
227 W/m·K131 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 397 J/g171 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -270°C-454 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

61 % IACS
59.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.83×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.11 µΩ·in
2.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.14 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.84 V · Corrosion Resistance 78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
35 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
45%

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
97 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

85 / 100
88 / 100

Polishability

78 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 92 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
10%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
25 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

59 kJ/m³
5 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

94.1 mm²/s
93.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

15
9

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.5 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale10501070

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability10501070
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

1050 vs 1070 — frequently asked

Is 1050 stronger than 1070?

Yes. 1050 has a typical yield strength of 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) against 25 MPa (3.63 ksi) for 1070 — about 3.6 times as much. Tensile strength is 110 MPa (16 ksi) vs 68 MPa (9.86 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1050 or 1070?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 1050 or 1070?

1070. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (30/100) for 1050.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1050 and 1070 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.